Monday, November 20

Wrong wrong WRONG

Saw the long-awaited Casino Royale last night, a worthy addition to the Bond legacy on nearly all points:
  • Daniel Craig as Bond: Very good.
  • Mads Mikkelsen as Le Chiffre: Excellent.
  • Story, locations, action, music: First-rate.
  • Caterino Murino as Solange: Hello.
  • Eva Green as Vesper: Eh.
    (I expected more from the primordial Bond girl.)
My only nagging complaint is the sacrilegious and profane “updating” of the classic high-stakes, winner-take-all game between Bond and Le Chiffre from Baccarat to, ugh, Texas Hold Em. Sorry, but James Bond does not wear sweat pants, does not smoke Kools, does not drink beer, and does not play Texas Hold Em. Nor, I suspect, do megalomaniac archvillains whose achilles heel is high-stakes gambling.

Baccarat is an elegant game of simple luck and poise. It involves no hushed narration from the sidelines, nor rote calculation of odds, nor bells and whistles such as re-buys, all-ins, check-raises, showdowns, or “tells” — and it's played in French.

Just watch the Baccarat scenes in Dr. No, Thunderball, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, For Your Eyes Only, GoldenEye... and then watch The World Series of Poker.

And you tell me.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I didn't even think about the fact they were playing Texas Hold em....but now that you mention it.

My bigger issue was that considering Casino Royal was among the first books, I somewhat expected the movie to also be from say the early 60's or whenever it was written. My first though in the beginning was that they didn't have cell phones back then. But whatever, I liked the movie and I like the new James Bond...a lot...

December 06, 2006 12:46 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home